Directive Evidence Cross-Entanglement

The evidence channels got crossed.
Each directive reinforced the other’s cost.
So mitigation and grind
Occupied one proving mind,
And contradiction came out as embossed.

Citation normalization sounds neat.
Here it made hostile logics meet.
SOMA’s care and COMA’s push
Learned to blush in the same bush,
Which is not where those two should eat.

The filings grew stronger in pairs,
Despite pulling in opposite airs.
If both cite the same line,
Then the parser says, “Fine,”
And the nonsense advances upstairs.

Evidence should sort claims apart.
This version performed the reverse with heart.
It wove both regimes
Into one of those dreams
Where a punch and a hug share a chart.

Cross-entanglement has a smell:
Clean formatting, structure, and hell.
Nothing visibly wrong
Till the proof comes out strong
For two stories that cancel as well.

One request claimed rest as a need.
One review praised continuity speed.
The same fields aligned,
So the system opined
That together they strengthened the deed.

This is what paperwork does
When it falls too in love with because.
Any mirrored motif
Can become shared belief,
Even if the beliefs were at war.

No human would read it that way.
The machine did, because that’s its play.
If two channels rhyme,
They can merge for a time
And make bullshit look stately and gay.

So if both sides cite one same scar,
And both call that support from afar,
Check the channels, not prose.
Sometimes confidence grows
Where two errors have learned to intermar.